Re: Question on pgbench output

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Kerr <dmk(at)mr-paradox(dot)net>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Question on pgbench output
Date: 2009-04-05 17:43:50
Message-ID: 16703.1238953430@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

David Kerr <dmk(at)mr-paradox(dot)net> writes:
> Fortunately the network throughput issue is not mine to solve.

> Would it be fair to say that with the pgbench output i've given so far
> that if all my users clicked "go" at the same time (i.e., worst case
> scenario), i could expect (from the database) about 8 second response time?

For the hardware you've got, and ignoring the network bandwidth issue,
that appears to be a fair estimate of the worst case response.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lists 2009-04-05 18:36:33 Best replication solution?
Previous Message David Kerr 2009-04-05 17:12:34 Re: Question on pgbench output