From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Installing a module for PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2009-03-06 17:07:29 |
Message-ID: | 167.1236359249@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Wow, is that it? I didn't realise it was that simple. Shouldn't something
> like this be mentioned in the modules section of the documentation? It's
> just that it wasn't obvious what constituted a module.
There is documentation here:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/contrib.html
Do you think it's inadequate? Or maybe it's just not prominent enough?
I could see how someone would miss it by failing to scroll down on what
seems to be just a table-of-contents page. Perhaps it needs to be its
own <sect1>.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Douglas J Hunley | 2009-03-06 17:13:14 | Re: [GENERAL] pgsql announce now on twitter |
Previous Message | Jack Orenstein | 2009-03-06 16:55:17 | Maximum transaction rate |