From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz> |
Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Exorcise "zero-dimensional" arrays (Was: Re: Should array_length() Return NULL) |
Date: | 2013-04-03 16:30:59 |
Message-ID: | 16677.1365006659@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> Zero as the default lower bound is consistent with most languages
>> (especially the common ones like C, C++, Java, & Python), in fact
>> I don't remember any language where that is not the case (ignoring
>> SQL) - and I've written programs in about 20 languages.
Fortran ... Basic ... actually I'd have thought that zero was a
minority position. Fashions change I guess.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-04-03 16:31:49 | Re: Drastic performance loss in assert-enabled build in HEAD |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2013-04-03 16:21:38 | Re: [PATCH] Exorcise "zero-dimensional" arrays (Was: Re: Should array_length() Return NULL) |