Re: fixing consider_parallel for upper planner rels

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: fixing consider_parallel for upper planner rels
Date: 2016-06-27 19:35:30
Message-ID: 16657.1467056130@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I'm not sure how to proceed here. I have asked Tom several times to
> look at the WIP patch and offer comments, but he so far has not done
> so.

Oh, I thought you were still actively working on it. What patch do
you want me to review?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-06-27 19:40:56 fixing subplan/subquery confusion
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-06-27 19:33:22 Re: MinMaxAggPath vs. parallel-safety