| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Jacobs <jacobs(at)penguin(dot)theopalgroup(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 7.2 Beta2 bug report |
| Date: | 2001-11-08 14:16:28 |
| Message-ID: | 16653.1005228988@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Jacobs <jacobs(at)penguin(dot)theopalgroup(dot)com> writes:
> I'm not very familiar with the grammar, but it seems strange that this works
> when timestamp does not:
> test=# create table test (date date);
Type "date" hasn't got all those gnarly SQL92-isms that we support now:
TIMESTAMP
TIMESTAMP(precision)
TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE
TIMESTAMP(precision) WITH TIME ZONE
TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE
TIMESTAMP(precision) WITHOUT TIME ZONE
However, I'm wondering if something could be done by not having an
explicit production for the first of these, only the other ones.
Off to experiment with bison ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Roderick A. Anderson | 2001-11-08 14:41:32 | Re: 7.2 Beta2 bug report |
| Previous Message | Andy Hallam | 2001-11-08 14:11:56 | Re: LIKE predicate and '\' character |