Re: Recovery failed on a backup with " lock AccessShareLock on object 16477/244169/0 is already held"

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "John Smith" <sodgodofall(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Recovery failed on a backup with " lock AccessShareLock on object 16477/244169/0 is already held"
Date: 2008-06-30 23:25:54
Message-ID: 16631.1214868354@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

"John Smith" <sodgodofall(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> BTW, what's with the bizarre "Local time zone must be set--see zic
>> manual" where the timezone should be? Are you intentionally selecting
>> the "Factory" zone?

> I don't think I've put the correct timezone file in /etc/localtime so
> it is using some default file from the Gentoo install.

Ah, yes, I was able to duplicate that behavior by overwriting
/etc/localtime with /usr/share/zoneinfo/Factory. I guess the Gentoo
folks failed in their intention to annoy you enough to make you set
the zone correctly ;-)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-06-30 23:37:29 Re: psql: FATAL: the database system is starting up
Previous Message John Smith 2008-06-30 22:35:42 Re: Recovery failed on a backup with " lock AccessShareLock on object 16477/244169/0 is already held"