Re: jsonpath versus NaN

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: jsonpath versus NaN
Date: 2020-07-07 22:16:42
Message-ID: 1662119.1594160202@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I'm going to push 0002 if there is no objection.
> Regarding 0001, I think my new error messages need review.

I do intend to review these, just didn't get to it yet.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2020-07-07 22:17:45 Re: jsonpath versus NaN
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2020-07-07 22:12:38 Re: jsonpath versus NaN