| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Patch to add Windows 7 support |
| Date: | 2009-01-27 16:34:41 |
| Message-ID: | 16614.1233074081@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
> The risks are pretty low imho. Not having the flag means that the
> server has access to the handles of objects in other jobs in the same
> session. When running as a service, that's basically nothing as the
> service runs in it's own session and is isolated through other means.
> When run from the command line, a hacked binary could send messages to
> the users UI (buttons and other controls for example). It would be a
> difficult attack to pull off, and very hard to gain from it. It's easy
> enough to leave the flag in console mode however - that does work on
> Windows 7.
Okay, but +1 for leaving it on in console mode.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-01-27 16:36:02 | Re: 8.4 release planning |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-01-27 16:31:55 | Re: 8.4 release planning |