Re: pgsql: Merge catalog/pg_foo_fn.h headers back into pg_foo.h headers.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Merge catalog/pg_foo_fn.h headers back into pg_foo.h headers.
Date: 2018-04-09 03:05:09
Message-ID: 16609.1523243109@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 06:35:39PM +0000, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Merge catalog/pg_foo_fn.h headers back into pg_foo.h headers.

> This patch or one of its relatives has visibly broken parallel builds
> for me. "make -j 4 install" directly called after a configure complains:

Hm. I'd tested "make -j all", but not going directly to "install".
Does it help if you add

$(SUBDIRS:%=install-%-recurse): | submake-generated-headers

to src/Makefile?

(That seems like a bit of a brute-force solution, though. Anybody
have a better answer?)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-04-09 06:13:54 Re: pgsql: Merge catalog/pg_foo_fn.h headers back into pg_foo.h headers.
Previous Message David Rowley 2018-04-09 03:03:51 Re: pgsql: Support partition pruning at execution time

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2018-04-09 03:15:01 Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS
Previous Message David Rowley 2018-04-09 03:03:51 Re: pgsql: Support partition pruning at execution time