| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Ian Cass" <ian(dot)cass(at)mblox(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Help with function optimisation |
| Date: | 2002-07-10 13:34:36 |
| Message-ID: | 16607.1026308076@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
"Ian Cass" <ian(dot)cass(at)mblox(dot)com> writes:
> I've got a function that I run as a trigger to update a summary table on
> insert to the main table. As you can see below, it does a select & an INSERT
> if not found, or an UPDATE if found. This currently works OK, but I'd like
> to improve performance by removing the SELECT & attempting an UPDATE. If it
> fails, I'd like to INSERT instead. Can this be done?
Sure. Do the UPDATE, check how many rows updated; if none, INSERT.
Finding out how many rows were updated involves a plpgsql command
"GET DIAGNOSTICS varname = ROW_COUNT" (gotta love these Oracle-derived
syntaxes :-()
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-07-10 14:09:17 | Re: Error with DISTINCT and AS keywords |
| Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2002-07-10 13:31:14 | Re: Error with DISTINCT and AS keywords |