Re: Why is "osprey" dumping core in REL8_2 branch?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Rémi Zara <remi_zara(at)mac(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why is "osprey" dumping core in REL8_2 branch?
Date: 2007-03-11 07:32:31
Message-ID: 16600.1173598351@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_Zara?= <remi_zara(at)mac(dot)com> writes:
>> (gdb) info locals
>> block = 0x4395000
>> chunk = 0x4395010
>> priorfree = 0x5395020
>> chunk_size = 16777216
>> blksize = 70864912
>> (gdb) p *block
>> $5 = {aset = 0x306d10, next = 0x0, freeptr = 0x5395020 <Address 0x5395020 out of bounds>, endptr = 0x5395020 <Address 0x5395020 out of bounds>}

> Well, that's pretty dang interesting. If the end of the block is indeed
> out of bounds as gdb claims, that'd explain why it crashes right here
> (actually the crash would be induced by the preceding line of code,
> where it tries to store a marker byte). But how can that be, unless
> malloc is completely broken? And if it is, why's it only affecting the
> 8.2 branch? I'm confused.

Whoa ... osprey just went green in the 8.2 branch, following what is
most surely an unrelated patch in vacuum.c. Can anyone explain that?
I distrust gift horses ...

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rémi Zara 2007-03-11 09:59:47 Re: Why is "osprey" dumping core in REL8_2 branch?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-03-11 05:24:15 Re: Race condition in pg_database_size()