Re: [HACKERS] Subtraction carry bug in xlog.c in 7.3 and 7.4

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "J(dot)R(dot) Nield" <jrnield(at)usol(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Subtraction carry bug in xlog.c in 7.3 and 7.4
Date: 2003-06-24 03:51:49
Message-ID: 16559.1056426709@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Should we add an Assert() to make it clear the current code is OK?

A comment maybe, but not an assert.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-06-24 04:22:59 How to disconnect a user
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-06-24 03:49:17 Re: 2Q implementaion for PostgreSQL buffer replacement.

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-06-24 03:55:06 Re: Patch to be verbose about being unable to read ~/.pgpasss...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-06-24 03:42:03 Re: pg_hba.conf CIDR mask doc patch