From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tirthankar Barari <tbarari(at)verizon(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Index space growing even after cleanup via autovacuum in Postgres 9.2 |
Date: | 2014-01-09 19:50:44 |
Message-ID: | 16547.1389297044@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tirthankar Barari <tbarari(at)verizon(dot)com> writes:
> However, we are noticing that after autovacuum, our disk space
> consumption is still increasing and the increase is in the index size
> (by querying pg_total_relation_size("mytable") and
> pg_indexes_size("mytable")).
> In Postgres 9.2.2, doesn't autovacuum cleanup dead indexes and reuse
> that space too? So, why do we see this not happening?
You've not provided enough info to speak in more than generalities, but:
whether index space is reclaimable depends a whole lot on your usage
patterns. There's provision to recycle pages that've become completely
empty, but as long as there's at least one key left on a leaf page,
it won't be recycled. So for instance if you have a time-ordered index
and you delete all but one out of every hundred entries in time sequence,
you're not going to get that space back short of a REINDEX.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brooke Beacham | 2014-01-09 20:08:03 | Add custom properties to a column's definition (pg_attribute) |
Previous Message | Nelson Green | 2014-01-09 18:55:35 | Re: Last inserted row id with complex PK |