Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> I agree the link should be fixed, but I can't see another canonical
> location for the document online: linking to CiteSeer (which itself is
> generated from the mention in our online docs) is probably not wise.
citeseer's cache still has the paper, and in it I find the authors'
email addresses ... could try writing to them ...
regards, tom lane