Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse
Date: 2022-04-15 17:15:49
Message-ID: 1653799.1650042949@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 10:05 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> The other shows
>> the age of OldestXmin at the end of the vacuum. Which is influenced by
>> what's currently running.

> As well as the age of OldestXmin at the start of VACUUM.

Is it worth capturing and logging both of those numbers? Why is
the age at the end more interesting than the age at the start?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2022-04-15 17:23:56 Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2022-04-15 17:11:03 Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse