| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Cleaning up unreferenced table files |
| Date: | 2005-05-09 03:54:06 |
| Message-ID: | 16523.1115610846@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> [ shrug ] It's still broken, and the reason is that there's no
>> equivalent of fsync for directory operations. Consider
> Traditionally that's because directory operations were always
> synchronous, and hence didn't need to be fsynced.
That might be true with respect to the process requesting the directory
operation ... but I think you missed the point entirely.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-09 04:00:21 | Re: pl/pgsql enabled by default |
| Previous Message | Satoshi Nagayasu | 2005-05-09 03:52:35 | Re: [HACKERS] read-only database |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dennis Bjorklund | 2005-05-09 04:10:02 | Re: lastval() |
| Previous Message | Satoshi Nagayasu | 2005-05-09 03:52:35 | Re: [HACKERS] read-only database |