| From: | Kevin Wooten <kdubb(at)me(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>, Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-jdbc <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Creating an index alters the results returned |
| Date: | 2014-01-04 01:07:30 |
| Message-ID: | 165094DE-AA45-45BD-B16D-722047FD6AA8@me.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-jdbc |
Regardless of type used… the driver and server should agree on the results.
On Jan 3, 2014, at 6:06 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Only thing I can think of is the JDBC driver and Postgres have a difference
>> of opinion on the precision of double precision. What happens if you
>> eliminate the double precision cast?
>
> This brings up the point as well, don't use floating point numbers if
> you want precise answers.
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2014-01-04 01:37:44 | Re: Suddenly all tables were gone |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2014-01-04 01:06:43 | Re: Creating an index alters the results returned |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pawel Veselov | 2014-01-13 23:26:46 | How can this abstract method error happen? |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2014-01-04 01:06:43 | Re: Creating an index alters the results returned |