| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vaishnavi Prabakaran <vaishnaviprabakaran(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Refactor handling of database attributes between pg_dump and pg_dumpall |
| Date: | 2018-01-19 15:00:00 |
| Message-ID: | 16507.1516374000@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Well, we could say that the properties of template1 and postgres
>> are only restored if you use --clean.
> True. Would that be a POLA violation, do you think?
It seems a bit non-orthogonal. Also, while your point that people
expect "merge" behavior from pg_dump is certainly true, I'm not
convinced that anybody would be relying on that for pg_dumpall.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-01-19 15:13:48 | Re: [HACKERS] Refactor handling of database attributes between pg_dump and pg_dumpall |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-01-19 14:55:08 | pgsql: Local partitioned indexes |