Re: fixing LISTEN/NOTIFY

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: fixing LISTEN/NOTIFY
Date: 2005-10-06 13:12:58
Message-ID: 16499.1128604378@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> However, I don't really like the idea of blocking the backend for a
> potentially significant amount of time in a state half-way between
> "committed" and "ready for the next query".

I wonder whether we could use something comparable to pg_multixact
or pg_subtrans, to convert the problem from one of "need to fit in
fixed amount of memory" to one of "it's on disk with some buffers
in memory".

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-10-06 13:24:54 Re: Outer where pushed down
Previous Message Dave Page 2005-10-06 12:53:56 Re: version dependent compilation