Re: vacuum timings

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: vacuum timings
Date: 2000-01-21 19:06:31
Message-ID: 16498.948481591@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Conclusions:
> o indexes never get smaller

Which we knew...

> o drop/recreate index is slower than vacuum of indexes

Quite a few people have reported finding the opposite in practice.
You should probably try vacuuming after deleting or updating some
fraction of the rows, rather than just the all or none cases.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Patrick Welche 2000-01-21 19:06:59 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Variable case database names
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-01-21 19:03:15 Re: set command