Re: BUG #4862: different results in to_date() between 8.3.7 & 8.4.RC1

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeremy Ford <jeremford(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #4862: different results in to_date() between 8.3.7 & 8.4.RC1
Date: 2009-06-22 14:24:49
Message-ID: 16497.1245680689@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I think we can safely conclude from these results that Oracle pays no
> attention whatsoever to leading spaces in either the input string, or
> the format string.

> If we want to copy this behaviour, I think the best way forward is to
> add some code that deliberately skips over any initial whitespace in
> either string. Any comments about this approach? I should be able to
> work up a patch over the next couple days.

I'm hesitant to fool with this post-RC, and we don't have "a couple of
days" to wait for a fix --- 8.4.0 is scheduled to wrap on Thursday.
However, I see that the first of these cases actually represents a
regression from 8.3 and before; existing releases get 2009-03-01 out
of it while 8.4 fails to. So it seems we'd better do something.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2009-06-22 14:38:32 Re: BUG #4869: No proper initialization of OpenSSL-Engine in libpq
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-06-22 14:03:45 Re: BUG #4869: No proper initialization of OpenSSL-Engine in libpq

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-06-22 14:27:17 Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-06-22 14:20:51 Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?