Re: I added a √ operator, the sqrt function is still used internally, but now there is a problem, it affects the := and .. operators of the database

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: 孤傲小二~阿沐 <2903807914(at)qq(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: I added a √ operator, the sqrt function is still used internally, but now there is a problem, it affects the := and .. operators of the database
Date: 2021-11-12 05:42:08
Message-ID: 1648741.1636695728@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"=?gb18030?B?ucKwwdChtv6hq7Ci4+U=?=" <2903807914(at)qq(dot)com> writes:
> # Description of Requirement:
> 1¡¢select ¡Ì num1; function
> 2¡¢The value of num1 is required to be: [0,9223372036854775807]
> 3¡¢¡Ì The operation does not allow decimals

Looks suspiciously like a homework assignment.

> I have now developed this feature on the PostgreSQL 14.0 kernel! But it affects the original function of the database:
> #&nbsp;Affected place
> 1¡¢ := assignment operator
> 2¡¢ Operator in 1..10

Today's lesson is: read the comments on the code you're modifying.
Notably on gram.y's list of "non keyword" tokens:

* Non-keyword token types. These are hard-wired into the "flex" lexer.
* They must be listed first so that their numeric codes do not depend on
* the set of keywords. PL/pgSQL depends on this so that it can share the
* same lexer. If you add/change tokens here, fix PL/pgSQL to match!

Since you didn't do that, PL/pgSQL is confused about the token codes
in use for DOT_DOT and so on.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 孤傲小二~阿沐 2021-11-12 05:51:10 回复: I added a √ operator, the sqrt function is still used internally, but now there is a problem, it affects the := and .. operators of the database
Previous Message 孤傲小二~阿沐 2021-11-12 05:16:22 回复: I added a √ operator, the sqrt function is still used internally, but now there is a problem, it affects the := and .. operators of the database