Re: Weird failure with latches in curculio on v15

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Fujii Masao <fujii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Weird failure with latches in curculio on v15
Date: 2023-02-03 07:46:36
Message-ID: 1647863.1675410396@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 8:35 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> we don't have a hard dependency on setsid()

> FTR There are no Unixes without setsid()...

Yeah. What I just got done reading in SUSv2 (1997) is
"Derived from the POSIX.1-1988 standard". We need not
concern ourselves with any systems not having it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-02-03 07:50:38 Re: Weird failure with latches in curculio on v15
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-02-03 07:44:22 Re: Weird failure with latches in curculio on v15