From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Craig James <craig_james(at)emolecules(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Who is causing all this i/o? |
Date: | 2011-06-19 17:08:30 |
Message-ID: | 16478.1308503310@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Craig James <craig_james(at)emolecules(dot)com> writes:
> On 6/17/11 11:51 AM, Shianmiin wrote:
>> We have a PostgreSQL 9.0.4 on CentOs for performance testing and we are
>> seeing the similar issue.
>> we have a "crazy" setup it has 1 database with 1000 identical schemas. There
>> are occasional I/O write storm
>> of over 100 MB/sec without any disk reads, and it could last for a couple of
>> minutes when the schemas/data are aggressively populated by pg_restore. All
>> the io writes seem to be on pgstat.tmp.
> Based on the advice I got from my original question, I changed autovacuum_naptime to "5min", and the problem completely disappeared. (I know that's a long interval, but this particular server gets maybe 5-10 heavy updates per week and is idle the rest of the time.)
> select count(1) from pg_database ;
> count
> -------
> 267
> It seems like there's a problem somewhere. Autovacuum has improved enormously in the last couple of years, but some change to its algorithm causes a lot of I/O thrashing when there are more than a few hundred separate databases.
Well, if you have a lot of databases then you definitely need to
increase the naptime to keep autovac's demands for stats within bounds.
I don't find that surprising, though I do wonder if we ought to redefine
the way that GUC works: right now, you get one autovac wakeup every
naptime/databases seconds.
The OP seems to have some other issue, though, since he says he's only
got 1 database.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rick Visser | 2011-06-19 19:26:51 | forgot password |
Previous Message | Craig James | 2011-06-19 15:35:50 | Re: Who is causing all this i/o? |