From: | PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | frank(dot)gagnepain(at)intm(dot)fr |
Subject: | BUG #16476: pgp_sym_encrypt_bytea with compress-level=6 : Wrong key or corrupt data |
Date: | 2020-06-03 07:41:21 |
Message-ID: | 16476-692ef7b84e5fb893@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 16476
Logged by: Frank Gagnepain
Email address: frank(dot)gagnepain(at)intm(dot)fr
PostgreSQL version: 10.13
Operating system: Debian 10
Description:
Hello to the support team,
I already sent a bug report for this issue, but PostgreSQL version was
9.4.21 which isnt supported anymore
So we tested this bug with a 10.13 PostgreSQL version this time and we got
the exact same issue.
I get "ERROR: Wrong key or corrupt data" when using successively function
pgp_sym_encrypt_bytea and pgp_sym_decrypt_bytea on only some bytea data in
db with those options :
compress-algo=1 (ZIP algo)
cipher-algo=aes256
compress-level=6 (which is the default compress-level)
With any other value for compress-level (0,1,2,3,4,5,7,8,9) for
pgp_sym_encrypt_bytea, i get no error with pgp_sym_decrypt_bytea...
Here is what i do to test this error :
create or replace function bytea_import(p_path text, p_result out bytea)
language plpgsql as $$
declare
l_oid oid;
r record;
begin
p_result := '';
select lo_import(p_path) into l_oid;
for r in ( select data
from pg_largeobject
where loid = l_oid
order by pageno ) loop
p_result = p_result || r.data;
end loop;
perform lo_unlink(l_oid);
end;$$;
select
pgp_sym_decrypt_bytea(pgp_sym_encrypt_bytea(bytea_import(DATA),'password','compress-algo=1,
cipher-algo=aes256, compress-level=6'),'password','compress-algo=1,
cipher-algo=aes256');
ERROR: Wrong key or corrupt data
Unfortunately i cant post any example of DATA since those are supposed to
be
sensitive data.
Nevertheless, does this kind of error rings a bell to anyone ?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Verite | 2020-06-03 11:51:19 | Re: Potential G2-item cycles under serializable isolation |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-06-03 02:28:29 | Re: BUG #16468: Doc: release note 13, missing GUC enable_groupingsets_hash_disk |