Re: Add version macro to libpq-fe.h

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvaro(dot)herrera(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Boris Kolpackov <boris(at)codesynthesis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add version macro to libpq-fe.h
Date: 2021-06-21 15:39:42
Message-ID: 1647451.1624289982@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> What will prevent us from forgetting to do something about this again,
> a year from now?

As long as we notice it before 15.0, we can fix it retroactively,
as we just did for 14. For that matter, fixing before 15.1 or
so would likely be Good Enough.

But realistically, how is this any worse of a problem than a hundred
other easily-forgotten coding rules we have? We manage to uphold
most of them most of the time.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-06-21 15:43:37 Re: Use simplehash.h instead of dynahash in SMgr
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-06-21 15:39:24 Re: disfavoring unparameterized nested loops