Re: Incorrect result of bitmap heap scan.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik(at)garret(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Incorrect result of bitmap heap scan.
Date: 2024-12-02 17:11:02
Message-ID: 1647379.1733159462@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 12:02 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Yup. I am saying that that qualifies as too-aggressive setting of the
>> all-visible bit. I'm not sure what rule we should adopt instead of
>> the current one, but I'd much rather slow down page freezing than
>> institute new page locking rules.

> Freezing a page, and setting a page all-visible are orthogonal.

Sorry, sloppy wording on my part.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2024-12-02 17:13:53 Re: Add “FOR UPDATE NOWAIT” lock details to the log.
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2024-12-02 17:07:00 Re: Incorrect result of bitmap heap scan.