Re: SQL-standard function body

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL-standard function body
Date: 2021-04-07 20:22:17
Message-ID: 1646498.1617826937@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Committed. Thanks!

Buildfarm suggests this has some issues under force_parallel_mode.
I'm wondering about missed fields in outfuncs/readfuncs, or the like.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2021-04-07 20:22:55 Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-04-07 20:19:35 Re: multi-install PostgresNode fails with older postgres versions