Re: One process per session lack of sharing

From: AMatveev(at)bitec(dot)ru
To: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: One process per session lack of sharing
Date: 2016-07-18 16:26:30
Message-ID: 1646372243.20160718192630@bitec.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

>So I think as long as process and thread have different function in OS,
>use process like thread will have overhead in practice.

But There are other negative things. I think parallel oriented
library usually do not work with process.
So Jvm integration is not exception. It is regularity.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-07-18 16:47:56 Re: Regression tests vs existing users in an installation
Previous Message AMatveev 2016-07-18 15:21:18 Re: One process per session lack of sharing