Re: Qestion about CREATE FUNCTION

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Cornelia Boenigk" <poppcorn(at)cornelia-boenigk(dot)de>
Cc: "pgsql-general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Qestion about CREATE FUNCTION
Date: 2002-03-01 21:41:32
Message-ID: 1646.1015018892@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Cornelia Boenigk" <poppcorn(at)cornelia-boenigk(dot)de> writes:
> Could anybody explain this behaviour?

See
http://www.ca.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.2/postgres/xfunc-sql.html
which says in part:

In the present release of PostgreSQL there are some unpleasant
restrictions on how functions returning composite types can be
used. Briefly, when calling a function that returns a row, we cannot
retrieve the entire row. We must either project a single attribute out
of the row or pass the entire row into another function. (Trying to
display the entire row value will yield a meaningless number.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Francisco Reyes 2002-03-01 21:48:16 Shared buffers vs large files
Previous Message Jean-Luc Lachance 2002-03-01 21:33:42 Re: improving performance of UNION and ORDER BY