From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Joseph Koshakow <koshy44(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fix overflow in DecodeInterval |
Date: | 2022-04-03 16:30:32 |
Message-ID: | 1645293.1649003432@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joseph Koshakow <koshy44(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 12:03 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Oh ... a bit of testing says that strtod() on an empty string
>> succeeds (returning zero) on Linux, but fails with EINVAL on
>> AIX. The latter is a lot less surprising than the former,
>> so we'd better cope.
> I'm not sure I follow exactly. Where would we pass an empty
> string to strtod()? Wouldn't we be passing a string with a
> single character of '.'?
Oh, I was thinking that we passed "cp + 1" to strtod, but that
was just caffeine deprivation. You're right, what we are asking
it to parse is "." not "". The result is the same though:
per testing, AIX sets EINVAL and Linux doesn't.
> So I think we need to check that endptr has moved both after
> the call to strtoi64() and strtod().
I'm not sure we need to do that explicitly, given that there's
a check later as to whether endptr is pointing at \0; that will
fail if endptr wasn't advanced.
The fix I was loosely envisioning was to check for cp[1] == '\0'
and not bother calling strtod() in that case.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2022-04-03 16:32:56 | Re: A qsort template |
Previous Message | Joseph Koshakow | 2022-04-03 16:22:12 | Re: Fix overflow in DecodeInterval |