From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Page at a time index scan |
Date: | 2006-05-03 14:56:56 |
Message-ID: | 16436.1146668216@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 15:35 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This is unnecessary and probably wrong.
> You'll need to be more specific about what you mean.
There is no point in marking a page half-dead, as that doesn't save
anyone else from visiting it, and it's probably wrong to mark a leaf
page as half-dead at all. That state is associated with upper pages.
Even if it were a legal tree configuration, marking the page half-dead
would make it impossible to insert any more keys in the page, which
doesn't strike me as an appropriate behavior; it's likely to force
excess I/O later due to unnecessary page splits during future inserts.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-05-03 15:23:35 | Re: Page at a time index scan |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-05-03 14:54:50 | Re: Page at a time index scan |