Re: pgxs problem

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Gregory Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Subject: Re: pgxs problem
Date: 2006-07-19 22:15:54
Message-ID: 16418.1153347354@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Yes, that's pretty small-minded. It should be something like
> PG_CONFIG = pg_config
> bindir := $(shell $(PG_CONFIG) --bindir)
> That way you can override it.

No objection here, although I'm not entirely convinced why anyone would
prefer doing that to setting their PATH. If the pg_config you want
isn't (first in) your PATH, none of the other PG programs will be
either, which seems like an awkward situation for getting any PG-related
work done.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-07-19 22:23:44 Re: Max size of a btree index entry
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-07-19 22:15:50 Re: Max size of a btree index entry