Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes
Date: 2024-05-10 21:31:33
Message-ID: 1641606.1715376693@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 06:50:54PM +0200, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
>> There are two commits that I think would benefit from being listed
>> (but maybe they are already listed and I somehow missed them, or they
>> are left out on purpose for some reason):

> I looked at both of these. In both cases I didn't see why the user
> would need to know these changes were made:

I agree that the buffering change is not likely interesting, but
the fact that you can now control-C out of a psql "\c" command
is user-visible. People might have internalized the fact that
it didn't work, or created complicated workarounds.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2024-05-10 21:37:25 Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2024-05-10 21:21:01 Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes