Re: [GENERAL] currval and DISCARD ALL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nigel Heron <nigel(at)psycode(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] currval and DISCARD ALL
Date: 2013-04-19 15:09:38
Message-ID: 16415.1366384178@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> It seems a bad idea to backpatch this; whoever wants this functionality
> in back branches should probably run a patched server.

Surely this is 9.4 material at this point in any case.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-04-19 16:03:19 Re: [GENERAL] currval and DISCARD ALL
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-04-19 15:04:43 Re: [GENERAL] currval and DISCARD ALL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Will Childs-Klein 2013-04-19 15:17:17 question about postgres storage management
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-04-19 15:04:43 Re: [GENERAL] currval and DISCARD ALL