Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> No, but it is a missing capability many will complain about. I can
> easily remove it. I saw no one comment when I added it to the patches
> queue.
I hadn't seen you add it to the patches queue ...
I did see Gavin's submission but did not yet have time to look at the
details. What does it *do* exactly --- simply allow INDEX as a
substitute for TABLE in the syntax, or more? I'm not thrilled at the
idea of adding a lot of duplicate coding for this.
regards, tom lane