From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Zsolt Ero <zsolt(dot)ero(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #16604: pg_dump with --jobs breaks SSL connections |
Date: | 2020-09-24 16:11:36 |
Message-ID: | 1638874.1600963896@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Zsolt Ero <zsolt(dot)ero(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I've created a minimal reproducible Dockerfile, it reproduces 100%. The PG
> server is configured to require client certificates.
I reproduced this locally, and the problem seems to be that
CloneArchive() is doing a far-less-than-half-baked job of
reconstructing the original connection parameters.
The data that PQconnectdbParams gets is just
(gdb) p keywords
$1 = {0x44ef22 "host", 0x44d52d "port", 0x44e4f0 "user", 0x4532b6 "password",
0x44ef14 "dbname", 0x45325f "fallback_application_name", 0x0}
(gdb) p values
$2 = {0x25459e0 "127.0.0.1", 0x25459a0 "5432", 0x2545180 "postgres", 0x0,
0x2a61d60 "dbname=regression", 0x2538410 "pg_dump", 0x0}
so parallel pg_dump is basically guaranteed to fail in any
case with even slightly unusual connection parameters.
Not sure why we should be trying to do it like that at
all; it'd be better if the original command-line parameters
got passed down in all cases. Looking at that now.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-09-24 17:24:43 | Re: BUG #16604: pg_dump with --jobs breaks SSL connections |
Previous Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2020-09-24 14:55:05 | Re: BUG #16632: Not a bug, just a typo |