From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items |
Date: | 1999-05-31 19:01:02 |
Message-ID: | 16380.928177262@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I said:
> I did find that the PROC structures are not counted in the initial
> sizing of the shared memory block.
Er ... yes they are ... never mind ...
At this point I am not going to make any further changes to the
shared-mem code unless Hiroshi and Tatsuo report that there are still
problems.
I would still like to alter the calling conventions for hash_search
and hash_seq, which are ugly and also dependent on static state
variables. But as far as I can tell right now, those are just code
beautification items rather than repairs for currently-existing bugs.
So it seems best not to risk breaking anything with so little testing
time left in the 6.5 cycle. I will put them on my to-do-for-6.6 list
instead.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pablo Funes | 1999-05-31 19:05:53 | Re: [HACKERS] please? |
Previous Message | Theo Kramer | 1999-05-31 18:58:08 | Re: [HACKERS] please? |