| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Correct handling of blank/commented lines in PSQL interactive-mode history |
| Date: | 2021-11-30 21:35:13 |
| Message-ID: | 1636512.1638308113@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 11:12:35PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Interesting. I can probably adjust my MUA to send "text/x-patch",
>> but I'll have to look around to see where that's determined.
> I would be interesting to know if "text/x-patch" is better than
> "text/x-diff" --- I currently use the later.
I found out that where that is coming from is "file -i", so I'm a
bit loath to modify it. Is there any hard documentation as to why
"text/x-patch" should be preferred?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2021-11-30 21:52:31 | Re: Correct handling of blank/commented lines in PSQL interactive-mode history |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2021-11-30 21:26:53 | Re: Correct handling of blank/commented lines in PSQL interactive-mode history |