Re: another plperl bug

"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I discovered a further plperl bug last night. If foo() is a SRF and
> therefore returns an arrayref, calling select foo() rather than select *
> from foo() causes a segfault because this line passes NULL as the argument:

> tupdesc = CreateTupleDescCopy(rsinfo->expectedDesc);

> I am not sure I even know what the behaviour should be, and my available
> time to work on a fix is severely contrained ATM.

It should do the same as plpgsql: throw an error about "set-returning
function called in a context that cannot accept a set", or however that
was phrased. I'll put in a fix.

regards, tom lane