From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
Cc: | Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: problem with large maintenance_work_mem settings and |
Date: | 2006-03-05 20:15:03 |
Message-ID: | 16339.1141589703@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> writes:
> samples % symbol name
> 24915704 96.2170 ltsReleaseBlock
> 387265 1.4955 LogicalTapeRead
> 168725 0.6516 inlineApplySortFunction
Hmm ... the comment in ltsReleaseBlock sez
/*
* Insert blocknum into array, preserving decreasing order (so that
* ltsGetFreeBlock returns the lowest available block number). This could
* get fairly slow if there were many free blocks, but we don't expect
* there to be very many at one time.
*/
We probably need to tweak things so this doesn't get called during the
"final merge" pass. Looking at it now.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-05 20:20:43 | Re: [PATCHES] LDAP auth |
Previous Message | Markus Bertheau | 2006-03-05 20:14:52 | pg.conf re-reading in signal handler or at next return to main loop? |