Re: Bad news for Open Source databases, acording to survey

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Marco Colombo <marco(at)esi(dot)it>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bad news for Open Source databases, acording to survey
Date: 2001-07-10 23:28:19
Message-ID: 16324.994807699@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Marco Colombo <marco(at)esi(dot)it> writes:
> "Open source database companies will not be able to compete with the price,
> performance, maturity, and functionality of the commercial vendors"

> price? A *free* product not being able to compete with the *price* of
> a commercial one?

I suppose he's talking about the open-source support companies, like
RedHat, Great Bridge, PostgreSQL Inc, etc, who are hoping to sell you
support and consulting services at a very definitely nonzero price.
(Still a lot less than an Oracle license, though.)

The long-term viability of that business model remains to be proven.
But what this argument fails to realize is that the open-source project
will still go on, even if all those companies go broke. Postgres has
never depended for its existence on any particular company, and I
certainly hope that it never will.

I concur with the general opinion that this article is mostly hot air...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-07-10 23:32:08 Re: Inner Join?
Previous Message Mark G. Franz 2001-07-10 23:21:27 Re: Grab data WHERE table.ID NOT LIKE otherTable.ID