From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Marco Colombo <marco(at)esi(dot)it> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Bad news for Open Source databases, acording to survey |
Date: | 2001-07-10 23:28:19 |
Message-ID: | 16324.994807699@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Marco Colombo <marco(at)esi(dot)it> writes:
> "Open source database companies will not be able to compete with the price,
> performance, maturity, and functionality of the commercial vendors"
> price? A *free* product not being able to compete with the *price* of
> a commercial one?
I suppose he's talking about the open-source support companies, like
RedHat, Great Bridge, PostgreSQL Inc, etc, who are hoping to sell you
support and consulting services at a very definitely nonzero price.
(Still a lot less than an Oracle license, though.)
The long-term viability of that business model remains to be proven.
But what this argument fails to realize is that the open-source project
will still go on, even if all those companies go broke. Postgres has
never depended for its existence on any particular company, and I
certainly hope that it never will.
I concur with the general opinion that this article is mostly hot air...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-07-10 23:32:08 | Re: Inner Join? |
Previous Message | Mark G. Franz | 2001-07-10 23:21:27 | Re: Grab data WHERE table.ID NOT LIKE otherTable.ID |