Re: Backup and restore through JDBC

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Marlon Petry <marlonpetry(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Backup and restore through JDBC
Date: 2006-09-29 15:19:09
Message-ID: 16320.1159543149@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Then after you recover from your head exploding you start devising some
> sort of sane API ...

That's the hard part. There is no percentage in having a library if
it doesn't do anything significantly different from what you could
accomplish via
system("pg_dump ...switches....");

What is it you hope to accomplish by having a library, exactly?
(And don't say "more control over the dump process". pg_dump is already
on the hairy edge of maintainability; we do *not* need to try to deal
with making it still function correctly after an application programmer
makes some random intervention in the process.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-09-29 15:40:32 Re: Another idea for dealing with cmin/cmax
Previous Message Paul B. Anderson 2006-09-29 15:12:08 Re: Stored procedure array limits