From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Cc: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable |
Date: | 2008-01-28 02:04:03 |
Message-ID: | 16296.1201485843@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
[ redirecting thread to -hackers ]
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 21:54 +0000, Gregory Stark wrote:
>> I liked the "synchronized_sequential_scans" idea myself.
> I think that's a bit too long. How about "synchronized_scans", or
> "synchronized_seqscans"?
We have enable_seqscan already, so that last choice seems to fit in.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2008-01-28 02:32:54 | Re: GSSAPI doesn't play nice with non-canonical host names |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2008-01-28 01:34:27 | Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2008-01-28 04:09:57 | Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2008-01-28 01:34:27 | Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable |