From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Julian Scarfe <julian(dot)scarfe(at)ntlworld(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Vacuum verbose output? |
Date: | 2003-01-14 16:10:30 |
Message-ID: | 16295.1042560630@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Julian Scarfe <julian(dot)scarfe(at)ntlworld(dot)com> writes:
> On 14/1/03 15:42, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> What do you have the FSM parameters in postgresql.conf set to? My guess
>> is you need to increase 'em.
> Currently set at the defaults, max_fsm_relations is 100, max_fsm_pages is
> 10000.
100 is definitely too small for max_fsm_relations; we've bumped that
default to 1000 for the next release. Given that you've got a
nearly-100k-page table, 10000 for max_fsm_pages is probably much too
small also.
> What are the implications/effects of increasing them?
Shared memory usage gets bigger. I think the max_fsm_pages multiplier
is 6 bytes per slot, so you could make it a million, or ten, without
stressing modern machines. I'd try 1000/1000000 for starters.
Don't forget you need a postmaster restart to make these changes take
effect.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-14 16:19:01 | Re: Vacuum verbose output? |
Previous Message | Julian Scarfe | 2003-01-14 16:04:08 | Re: Vacuum verbose output? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-14 16:19:01 | Re: Vacuum verbose output? |
Previous Message | Julian Scarfe | 2003-01-14 16:04:08 | Re: Vacuum verbose output? |