Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions
Date: 2010-03-10 07:39:00
Message-ID: 162867791003092339t5c4f1c4bg3e47ca57895d66cf@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2010/3/9 Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> updated version, concat function doesn't use separator
>
> btw...very cool stuff.  I took a brief look at the sprintf
> implementation.  The main switch:
> switch (pdesc.field_type)
>
> It looks like format codes we choose not to support (like %p) are
> silently ignored.  Is this the correct behavior?

it could be enhanced. sprintf is little bit baroque function and I am
not able to take all details. Please, add comment with proposals for
change.

Pavel

>
> merlin
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2010-03-10 09:09:57 walreceiver is uninterruptible on win32
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2010-03-10 06:29:19 Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration