From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: quoting psql varible as identifier |
Date: | 2010-01-25 12:36:49 |
Message-ID: | 162867791001250436u129501e5y84c45ea1c892a106@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello
I hope, so this version is more readable and more clean. I removed
some not necessary checks.
regards
Pavel
2010/1/22 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> here is new variant. Add scan_state flag "valid" and enhance
>> protection against execution broken statement.
>
> This doesn't make sense to me. You've changed the way \set is handled
> - in a way that doesn't seem particularly appropriate to me - but most
> of the other backslash commands are unmodified - but then there's this
> hack at the bottom that overrides the return value if
> psql_scan_is_valid() fails. And then there's this:
>
> - /* we need not do psql_scan_reset() here */
> + psql_scan_reset(scan_state);
>
> It's extremely unclear what the rationale for this change is.
>
> Basically, you need to either improve the comments in here so that
> someone can understand what is going on, or you need to submit it with
> some detailed documentation explaining the rationale behind each
> change and why it is right, or more than likely both. But I think the
> whole approach is likely off-base and you need to go back and think
> about a cleaner way to get this done.
>
> ...Robert
>
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
variable-escaping.diff | application/octet-stream | 12.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2010-01-25 12:37:18 | Re: pg_listener entries deleted under heavy NOTIFY load only on Windows |
Previous Message | Herouth Maoz | 2010-01-25 11:37:31 | Re: Questions about connection clean-up and "invalid page header" |