From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Scott Bailey <artacus(at)comcast(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Review: listagg aggregate |
Date: | 2010-01-25 10:34:59 |
Message-ID: | 162867791001250234jff7765du9ab7ddb3f3d8f53a@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2010/1/25 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>:
> On sön, 2010-01-24 at 21:29 -0800, Scott Bailey wrote:
>> I think listagg or string_agg would be the most appropriate names. Oh
>> and before Oracle had wm_concat, Tom Kyte wrote a function called
>> stragg that was pretty popular.
>
> Well,
>
> xmlagg -> concatenates values to form xml datum
> array_agg -> concatenates values to form array datum
> ??? -> concatenates values to form string datum
>
> So it's pretty clear that listagg does not fit into this scheme.
when you define list as text domain, then this the name is correct.
searching "list sql string" on google. You can see, so "list" is usually used.
Regards
Pavel
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2010-01-25 10:42:06 | Re: pg_listener entries deleted under heavy NOTIFY load only on Windows |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-01-25 10:09:33 | Re: Review: listagg aggregate |