Re: default_language

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: default_language
Date: 2010-01-25 07:09:52
Message-ID: 162867791001242309x2147f16fx24277529828434a9@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2010/1/25 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>:
> On sön, 2010-01-24 at 20:32 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Why do we have a parameter called "default_do_language" when we don't
>> have a parameter called "default_language"?
>
> According to the SQL standard, the default language for CREATE FUNCTION
> is SQL.  Should we implement that?
>

isn't it SQL/PSM ?

Pavel

>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-01-25 07:20:01 Re: default_language
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-01-25 07:08:18 Re: default_language