From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2010-01-23 05:33:15 |
Message-ID: | 162867791001222133s330fe940mee69dcb99a95dda5@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers pgsql-hackers |
2010/1/23 Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> "David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
>>>
>>> On Jan 22, 2010, at 4:54 PM, Mark Mielke wrote:
>>>>
>>>> MS SQL, MySQL, SQLite - do they have advocacy problems due to the SQL in
>>>> their name? I think it is the opposite. SQL in the name almost grants
>>>> legitimacy to them as products. Dropping the SQL has the potential to
>>>> increase confusion. What is a Postgres? :-)
>>
>>> Something that comes after black, but before white.
>>
>> Yeah. As best I can tell, most newbies think that PostgreSQL means
>> Postgre-SQL --- they're not too sure what "Postgre" is, but they guess
>> it must be the specific name of the product. And that annoys those of
>> us who would rather they pronounced it "Postgres". But in terms of
>> recognizability of the product it's not a liability. The business about
>> pronunciation is a red herring. It's just as unclear whether MySQL is
>
> My personal experience has shown that people not familiar with the project
> can't remember it's name (even 10 minutes after I said it). It doesn't
> really roll off your tongue, unless you count tree nodes in your sleep.
> This "may" have an affect on the project's reach.
>
> I am not really advocating a name change, but if a different name makes
> postgresql more popular, however silly that may seem, then I am all for it.
> This is a difficult marketing decision.
I am not sure so different name makes postgresql more popular - it is
marketing for short-live products. If I can speak some: for Czech
language - the pronunciation of PostgreSQL in Czech isn't any problem.
PostgreSQL is mark with very good reputation - and some pople will go
from Oracle or MySQL, I'll have a better job then to explain so
Postgres is PostgreSQL.
so for me -1
Pavel
>
> --
> Andrew Chernow
> eSilo, LLC
> every bit counts
> http://www.esilo.com/
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Grzegorz Jaskiewicz | 2010-01-23 06:43:15 | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Andrew Chernow | 2010-01-23 05:25:09 | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Grzegorz Jaskiewicz | 2010-01-23 06:43:15 | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Andrew Chernow | 2010-01-23 05:25:09 | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL |